

The Christmas Lake subwatershed is located along the southern boundary of the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District (MCWD or District) and within the cities of Chanhassen and Shorewood. The subwatershed is dominated by Christmas Lake and is mostly developed. A small stream drains the upper part of the subwatershed and outlets into southwest Christmas Lake.
Christmas Lake has some of the best water quality in the district and the Metro area. However, there has been a very gradual trend of declining water quality, the cause of which is unknown. The sport fishery in Christmas Lake is excellent, and it is one of the few lakes in the Metro area that is managed as a two-story (both warm and cool water) fishery because of its depth and excellent water quality.
Over the next ten years, the District’s focus in the Christmas Lake subwatershed will be on protecting and improving water quality in the Christmas Lake and conserving ecological integrity within the subwatershed. The following will be particular focus areas:
The Christmas Lake subwatershed is located along the southern boundary of the MCWD and within the cities of Chanhassen and Shorewood (see Figure 1). The subwatershed is 742 acres in size (1.2 square miles).
The Christmas Lake subwatershed is located within the Eastern St. Croix moraine region, and the topography is typical of that region: erratic surface relief and numerous depressed areas that formed into wetlands, small ponds, and lakes. The eastern edge of the subwatershed is a highly sloped linear glacial formation that forms the bluffs on the east shore of the lake.
The 2003 MCWD Hydrologic, Hydraulic, and Pollutant Loading Study (HHPLS) subdivided the subwatershed into five subwatershed units, designated CL-1 through CL-5 (see Figure 2). As detailed in the HHPLS, some of the small basins in the subwatershed (CL-2, 3 and 4) are landlocked and have no natural outlet. The subwatershed discharges into an outlet under Highway 7 into St. Albans Bay of Lake Minnetonka.
The depth to bedrock within the subwatershed varies from 200 to 300 feet. Quaternary deposits--the surficial material overlaying the bedrock--are high relief New Ulm loamy till, with a sandy deposit on the north end of the subwatershed.
Soils within the watershed are predominantly Natural Resources Conservation Service Hydrologic Soil Group B (loamy soils with moderate infiltration potential) (see Figure 3), with group D (clayey soils with very low infiltration potential) soils found in low-lying areas and generally hydric, or showing indications of inundation (see Figure 4).
Existing data sources do not highlight any unique or scenic areas in this subwatershed. The Minnesota historic features database lists three properties in the subwatershed: a former resort on Christmas Lake, and two farmhouses.
Christmas Lake dominates the watershed. Land cover as classified by the Minnesota Land Cover Classification System (MLCCS) is illustrated in Figure 5a and Figure 5b. Much of the watershed is developed to typical suburban densities with a low to medium degree of imperviousness. There are a number of small wetlands in the southern subwatershed, generally surrounded by small areas of woodland or grassland.
The subwatershed is almost fully developed, and there are only a few remaining patches of relatively undeveloped landscape. Most of these are wetlands or are wooded portions of large residential lots. No areas within the subwatershed have been identified by the DNR or the Minnesota County Biological Survey (MCBS) as being high-value vegetative or ecological areas.
The most recent DNR fish survey for Christmas Lake was conducted in 2001. It identified a healthy sport fishery featuring rainbow trout and healthy panfish population consisting of bluegills and pumpkinseed and hybrid sunfish. Northern pike, largemouth bass, green sunfish, and yellow perch were also found during the fish survey. Christmas Lake is one of the few lakes in the Metro Region that is managed as a two-story (both cool and warm fishery) lake because of its good water quality. This means that the lake is cold enough and has enough oxygen to support trout at depths normally devoid of fish during the summer. To support the two-story fishery the lake continues to be stocked with catchable size adult rainbow trout. The Minnesota Natural Heritage Information System lists two fish species of special concern in the Christmas Lake subwatershed: least darters and pugnose shiners.
Christmas Lake is under a Fish Consumption Advisory for mercury, and was added to the state’s list of Impaired Waters in 1998 for that reason. The Minnesota Department of Health, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), and the DNR have collaborated to monitor fish for contaminants at over 1,000 sites in Minnesota. Fish from popular lakes and streams and those from known or suspected polluted sites are routinely collected and tested for mercury, which is found in most fish tested in Minnesota lakes, and PCB contamination. These test results are used to monitor pollution and to provide more specific fish consumption advisories beyond the general advisories for Minnesota. More detailed fish consumption advice that is similar to or slightly more restrictive than the general advice has been prepared for Christmas Lake. Mercury contamination is being addressed by a region-wide TMDL process by the MPCA.
Eurasian watermilfoil has been confirmed in Christmas Lake since 1992. The City of Chanhassen obtained an aquatic vegetation survey in 2001 from the firm Blue Water Science. The survey revealed a wide variety of beneficial vegetation as well as Eurasian watermilfoil and curly leaf pondweed. At that time the dominant species was water celery, a plant that is an important food for waterfowl and that provides good spawning habitat and cover for fish. Other dominant species include northern watermilfoil, coontail, chara, and water stargrass. Eurasian watermilfoil was found at about one-third of the sampled sites but was sparse and mixed with other native plants. Curly leaf pondweed was found at about one-quarter of the sampled sites, but at low densities.
The 2003 MCWD Functional Assessment of Wetlands (FAW) identified one small wetland with exceptional vegetative diversity and another with high diversity. Three wetlands were classified as having exceptional aesthetic and fish habitat values (see Figure 13).
The principal land uses in the subwatershed are single family residential and park and open space (see Figure 7). Much of the area identified as “vacant” is wetland.
Table 1. Percent of Christmas Lake subwatershed by 2000 land use.
|
Land Use 2000 |
Acres |
% of Subwatershed |
|
Single Family Residential |
335.7 |
45.2 |
|
Water |
281.8 |
37.9 |
|
Vacant |
106.0 |
14.3 |
|
Park and Open Space* |
6.8 |
1.0 |
|
Multi Family |
5.7 |
0.8 |
|
ROW |
5.0 |
0.6 |
|
Industrial |
1.5 |
0.2 |
|
|
742.5 |
|
Source: Metropolitan Council. See Figure 7.
Future land use in the northern subwatershed is not expected to change dramatically by 2020 or 2030 (see Figure 8 and Figure 9). A few remaining tracts of undeveloped land or subdividable lots are expected to be used for infill housing.
The 2030 land use is not expected to vary significantly from the existing and 2020 planned land use. The Metropolitan Council 2030 Planning Framework classifies the entire subwatershed as within an overall developing area, although most of any new development in the subwatershed is expected to occur prior to 2020.
A public boat access to Christmas Lake located on the north end of the lake (see Figure 6). There are no public beaches or parks on the lake. Because of its clarity, Christmas Lake attracts snorklers and SCUBA divers from across the Metro area.
The Department of Natural Resources’ Public Waters Inventory identifies four basins within the Christmas Lake subwatershed as under the jurisdiction of the DNR (see Figure 10). These include Christmas Lake, Como Lake and two unnamed wetlands.
Table 2. Public Waters in the Christmas Lake subwatershed.
|
DNR ID # |
Name |
|
27-137P |
Christmas Lake |
|
27-145P |
Como Lake |
|
27-892W |
Unnamed |
|
10-131W |
Unnamed |
Source: Minnesota DNR. See Figure 10.
The HHPLS included detailed modeling of the current and 2020 hydraulic and hydrologic conditions in the subwatershed. That modeling includes the following results for modeled locations (lakes, ponds, channels, and crossings) within the subwatershed:
Those detailed results are not reproduced here, but are incorporated by reference. The HHPLS model predicted no significant increase in high water levels or peak discharges between current conditions and expected 2020 conditions. However, some landlocked subwatershed units are present, as well as numerous pocket wetlands that local plans indicate may in the future be connected or drained.
Table 3. Modeled peak discharge from the Christmas Lake subwatershed (cfs).
|
Event |
Existing |
2020 |
Snowmelt |
|
1.5 year, 24 hour |
0.8 |
- |
- |
|
100 year, 24 hour |
2.2 |
2.3 |
- |
|
100-year, 10-day |
- |
- |
4.9 |
Source: 2003 MCWD Hydrologic, Hydraulic, and Pollutant Loading Study (HHPLS)
Christmas Lake is the primary receiving water within the subwatershed, and is classified by the DNR for shoreland management purposes as a Recreational Development lake. Tables 4 and 5 below detail the physical and water quality characteristics of the lake. It is a large and deep lake, with some of the best water quality in the District, and in the Metro area. It has consistently scored an A on the District’s annual lake report cards. Water quality very nearly meets the District’s goal of 15 μg/L established in the HHPLS, although the long term trend has been slightly declining water quality.
Table 4. Physical characteristics of lakes in the Christmas Lake subwatershed.
|
Lake |
Surface Area |
Maximum Depth |
Watershed to Lake Area Ratio |
DNR Classification |
|
Christmas |
276 |
87 |
1.5:1 |
Recreational Development |
Source: Minnesota DNR.
Table 5. Selected water quality goals and current conditions of lakes in the Christmas Lake subwatershed.
|
Lake |
1997 TP Goal (μg/L) |
HHPLS TP Goal (μg/L) |
1997-2004 Average TP (μg/L) |
2004 TP (μg/L) |
2004 Chl-a (μg/L) |
2004 Secchi (m) |
2004 TSI |
|
Christmas |
18 |
15 |
17 |
29 |
0.1 |
4.9 |
33 |
TP = Total phosphorus concentration
Source: MCWD.
According to standards established by the MPCA, water quality in Christmas Lake is fully supportive of swimming. Christmas Lake is a Metropolitan Council Priority Lake. The Council uses the priority lake list to focus its resources as well as to determine which lakes need to have a nutrient budget analysis completed as part of environmental reviews when they are impacted by a proposed project.
There is a channel that conveys drainage from the southern subwatershed unit to the lake. No monitoring data is available for this stream. This channel is experiencing some erosion, possibly conveying sediment to the lake. No information is available to assess the potential causes or extent of the erosion.
There are no public drainage ditches established under Minnesota Statutes Chapter 103E within this subwatershed.
Approximately 40 percent of the land area within the Christmas Lake subwatershed is shown on the National Wetland Inventory as wetland (see Table 6), with the bulk of that Christmas Lake.
Table 6. National Wetlands Inventory wetlands in the Christmas Lake subwatershed.
|
Circular 39 Type |
Area (acres) |
Cowardin Class |
Area (acres) |
|
Seasonal |
2.0 |
Emergent |
28.1 |
|
Shallow Marsh |
26.0 |
Scrub Shrub |
0.7 |
|
Deep Marsh |
1.6 |
Unconsolidated Bottom |
271.2 |
|
Open Water |
269.7 |
|
|
|
Scrub Shrub |
0.7 |
|
|
|
Total |
300.0 |
|
300.0 |
Source: Minnesota DNR.
In 2001-2003 the District undertook a Functional Assessment of Wetlands on all wetlands greater than one-quarter acre in size. This assessment used a variant of the Minnesota Routine Assessment Method. In contrast to Table 6 above, which shows wetland acreage and type from the National Wetlands Inventory completed in the 1980s, Table 7 below shows the acreage and type as assessed in the field. Using the results of that analysis, individual wetlands were assigned to one of four categories – Preserve, and Manage 1, 2, or 3 (see Figure 12 and Table 8). Wetlands that were evaluated as Exceptional or High on certain ecological or hydrologic values were assigned to the Preserve category. The balance of evaluated wetlands were assigned to a category based on this assessment of current functions and values, with Manage 1 wetlands exhibiting higher values and Manage 2 and 3 moderate or lower values. Refer to the Functional Assessment of Wetlands (2003) for details of methodology, classification, and management recommendations.
Table 7. Dominant wetland type in the Christmas Lake subwatershed as assessed in the Functional Assessment of Wetlands.
|
Circular 39 Type |
Area (acres) |
|
Wet Meadow |
4.9 |
|
Shallow Marsh |
15.5 |
|
Deep Marsh |
0.7 |
|
Open Water |
26.0 |
|
Scrub Shrub |
1.1 |
|
Lakes |
255.4 |
|
Not typed |
1.2 |
|
TOTAL |
304.8 |
Note: Based on field assessment. Excludes those areas determined in the field not to be wetlands, and stormwater ponds clearly excavated out of upland. Includes some small areas that were not field assessed.
Source: MCWD 2003 Functional Assessment of Wetlands. See Figure 11.
Table 8. Wetland management classifications of wetlands in the Christmas Lake subwatershed as determined in the Functional Assessment of Wetlands.
|
Classification |
Number |
Area (acres) |
% of total |
|
Preserve |
13 |
33.2 |
57.2 |
|
Manage 1 |
10 |
9.4 |
16.2 |
|
Manage 2 |
8 |
5.4 |
9.3 |
|
Manage 3 |
7 |
10.0 |
17.3 |
|
TOTAL |
|
58.0 |
|
Note: The FAW classification excluded large lakes and wetlands less than ¼ acre in size; those areas are included in the NWI, so total will not match Tables 6 or 7.
Source: MCWD 2003 Functional Assessment of Wetlands. See Figure 12.
The Christmas Lake subwatershed has several large wetlands that are classified in the Preserve category (see Figure 12). Some smaller wetlands in the southern watershed were rated highly on vegetative diversity or were exceptionally sensitive to impacts from the watershed. Como Lake in the northern subwatershed was rated as exceptional for fish habitat and aesthetic values, while some fringe wetlands to Christmas Lake were rated as exceptional fish habitat (see Figure 13).
Some of the wetlands were also evaluated for restoration potential. Factors considered were the ease with which the wetland could be restored, the number of landowners within the historic basin, the size of the potential restoration area, the potential for establishing buffer areas or water quality ponding, and the extent and type of hydrologic alteration. No wetlands in the subwatershed were identified in the FAW as being of high restoration potential (see Figure 14). Several were rated as of moderate potential.
All the cities with land in this subwatershed participate in the National Flood Program and have completed Flood Insurance Studies. Figure 13 indicates that no 100-year or 500-year floodplain has been delineated within this subwatershed.
The HHPLS identified the infiltration potential of the upland areas within the subwatershed as generally medium. Because of the organic or clayey nature of the soils in the wetland areas, in general infiltration potential there is low (see Figure 16). The Carver County Water Resource Management Plan classifies the groundwater resources of in the southern subwatershed area as being of medium to low sensitivity to pollution. The Hennepin County Geologic Atlas classifies the northern subwatershed as generally low sensitivity, except for a narrow band at the north end of Christmas Lake where the soils are sandy loam, which is classified as medium sensitivity (see Figure 17).
No municipal drinking water wells are located within the Christmas Lake subwatershed, but the Minnesota Department of Health has not yet designated Drinking Water Sensitivity Management Areas (DWSMA) for all the wells in the general vicinity. It is possible that part of the DWSMA for nearby wells might be located within this subwatershed. The County Well Index has records of fewer than 10 active private, shallow wells within the subwatershed.

Source: MCWD.
Land use change impacts downstream water quality by increasing the volume of runoff and the concentration and load of nutrients and sediment transported to receiving waters. Table 9 illustrates how land use change such as the expected conversion of vacant land to low-density residential could be expected to ultimately impact water quality in Christmas Lake. The table also illustrates the impact of a regulatory program managing these impacts.
Ultimate development in this case is defined as the conversion of all agricultural lands and one-half of the upland forested area that remains undeveloped in the 2020 land use plans. This conversion may take place by 2030 or require significantly more time; but it is assumed that at some point in the future these conversions will occur. More detail regarding this modeling can be found in Technical Appendix A. Because the majority of the watershed is fully developed, there is little/no change in modeling results among the analyzed time period.
Table 9 contrasts three nutrient loading reduction scenarios. Scenarios 1 and 2 contrast the expected results if there were no regulatory program to the results under the existing regulatory program. The HHPLS assumed that there would be no load increase from future development; the third scenario in Table 9 indicates that even with a regulatory program that strictly prohibits any new phosphorus loading, additional reductions would be necessary to achieve the desired phosphorus concentration goal of 15μg/L.
Table 9. Christmas Lake modeled 2020 and ultimate development water quality and the total phosphorus loading reduction necessary to achieve in-lake total phosphorus concentration goals.
|
Christmas Lake TP Goal = 15 μg/L |
2000 |
2020 |
Ultimate Development |
|
Scenario 1: No Regulatory Program | |||
|
Predicted in-lake TP (μg/L) |
|
15 |
15 |
|
P load decrease needed to achieve 15 μg/L (lbs/year) |
|
3 | |
|
Scenario 2: Current Regulatory Program |
| ||
|
Predicted in-lake TP (μg/L) |
15 |
15 | |
|
P load decrease needed to achieve 15 μg/L (lbs/year) |
|
3 | |
|
Scenario 3: Regulatory Program That Prohibits A Net Increase in Loading from New Development (As assumed in HHPLS) | |||
|
Predicted in-lake TP (μg/L) |
|
15 | |
|
Additional P load decrease needed to achieve 15 μg/L (lbs/year) |
|
2 | |
The following section presents the 17 watershed goals approved by the MCWD, measurable objectives, metrics and the specific goals and actions for the Christmas Lake subwatershed.
Promote abstraction of surface water where feasible for the purposes of improving water quality and increasing groundwater recharge throughout the watershed.
Land development and the associated creation of new impervious surface increases the volume of stormwater runoff. The new runoff volume can convey more pollutants to receiving waters and may increase erosion and sediment transport, negatively affecting water quality. Development also decreases the amount of stormwater that naturally percolates into the soil to recharge groundwater, thus reducing baseflow in streams, changing hydrology in groundwater-fed wetlands, and decreasing water availability in drinking water aquifers. Most of the Christmas Lake subwatershed is developed, and those hydrologic impacts have already occurred.
Abstraction of stormwater (retained on site through infiltration, evapotranspiration, or capture and reuse) reduces the amount of runoff from the site conveying pollutants. The most common type of abstraction, infiltration, reduces runoff, which helps recharge groundwater. Filtration offers an opportunity to use soil to naturally cleanse stormwater prior to discharge. Increased abstraction and filtration in the Christmas Lake subwatershed is desirable for three primary reasons: 1) to recharge groundwater inputs and reduce pollutant loading into Christmas Lake; 2) to help prevent localized flooding in landlocked basins with no natural outlet; and 3) to protect the hydrology of discharge (groundwater-fed) wetlands in the subwatershed. Many of those wetlands have high ecological values and are dependant on groundwater to maintain those functions and values.
A key strategy to achieve this goal is the adoption of a volume management standard for new development and redevelopment that requires the abstraction of one inch of rainfall. Much of the subwatershed has at least moderate infiltration potential. Requiring new development and redevelopment to abstract some of the new stormwater generated and encouraging retrofitting to increase infiltration on existing sites would:
Because the Christmas Lake subwatershed is almost entirely developed, there will be few new opportunities to implement abstraction. The primary strategies will be providing for infiltration on infill development and redevelopment, and encouraging retrofits on existing development.
Desired Outcomes: Increased infiltration, reduction in pollutant loading and volumes of runoff to supplement other goals.
Metrics: Acre-feet of infiltration to meet nutrient loading reductions for water quality and volume reductions for water quantity goals.
Increase abstraction and infiltration to reduce runoff volumes carrying pollutant loads to Christmas Lake, minimize potential flooding in landlocked basins, and to promote groundwater recharge.
Promote activities that maintain, support and enhance floral, faunal quantity and ecological integrity of upland and aquatic resources throughout the watershed.
Christmas Lake is the primary ecological resource in the subwatershed. The Christmas Lake subwatershed also includes a number of wetlands with exceptional or high fish or wildlife habitat value as well as wetlands with exceptional or high vegetative diversity. The Key Conservation Areas identified in Figure 19 of this plan include those wetlands as well as associated upland areas of high ecological value such as maple-basswood forest. Within these conservation areas, wherever possible, the District would promote the conservation or establishment of native vegetation to increase or maintain infiltration rates; decrease or maintain runoff rates and pollutant conveyance to water resources; and minimize erosion of shorelines and streambanks. Conservation of those associated upland areas not only provides additional habitat type, but also helps preserve local runoff and infiltration rates and surface water quality. Sustaining or improving water quality and ecological integrity is necessary to meet the District goals in this plan as well as to meet state and federal nondegradation, water quality and biological integrity requirements and to prevent the need for future TMDLs.
Christmas Lake is home to a sport fishery. There is some information on aquatic vegetation communities in the lake. The primary strategies for sustaining or improving aquatic communities are the acquisition of new data such as shoreline vegetation surveys and management plans, and maintenance of water quality. There are several wetlands in the subwatershed with exceptional or high vegetative diversity. These would be inspected at least annually for invasive vegetative species.
Desired Outcomes: Functional and healthy ecological corridors and waters throughout the subwatershed.
Metrics:
Maintain and improve overall ecological integrity within the subwatershed.
A. Protect existing fish and wildlife habitat and promote the restoration of habitat areas and corridors by the conservation and restoration of key ecological areas (see Figure 19).
B. Provide regulatory incentives for the preservation of undisturbed native vegetation as sites develop.
C. Require MCWD review of and comment on preliminary plats and vegetation surveys.
Maintain conditions suitable for a healthy and varied sport fish community within Christmas Lake.
Maintain a healthy aquatic vegetation community.
Preserve, maintain and improve aesthetic, physical, chemical and biological composition of surface waters and groundwater within the District.
The HHPLS used an extensive public input process to establish water quality goals for the primary receiving waters in the District, focusing primarily on identifying target total phosphorus concentrations. This plan identifies those plus additional goals related to water quality. This plan sets forth a set of actions the District will undertake to reduce pollutant loading in the subwatershed and achieve and maintain water quality goals. The achievement of these water quality goals is not only necessary to meet state and federal water quality requirements and to prevent future TMDLs, but also to meet this plan’s ecological integrity goals.
Desired Outcomes: Achievement of in-lake nutrient concentration goals through achievement of nutrient loading reductions.
Metrics:
Achieve and maintain an in-lake total phosphorus concentration goal of 15 μg/L in Christmas Lake.
Achieve and maintain other state lake water quality standards including >1.4 m Secchi clarity and 14 ug/L chl-a, in Christmas Lake.
Minimize pollutant loading contribution to St Albans Bay from Christmas Lake.
Minimize the risks of threats to public health through the development of programs, plans and policies that improve the quality of surface and groundwater resources.
There are several potential threats to public health in the Christmas Lake subwatershed. Sewage overflows from breaks or improperly functioning infrastructure could result in overflows discharged to downstream water resources. An additional potential source of pathogens is waterfowl, which are attracted to open water with easy routes from the water to vegetation on shore. The District’s role in minimizing the threats to public health in the subwatershed is mainly to provide targeted information to landowners and LGUs.
Desired Outcomes: Minimization of threats to public health from contact with contaminated surface waters.
Metrics: Reported cases of illness transmission via surface water contact.
Minimize risks to human health and water quality from land use activities.
Maintain a vegetated shoreline on Christmas Lake where practical and effective to reduce overpopulation of the lake with waterfowl.
Require LGUs and other agencies to manage public sanitary sewer infrastructure to minimize sewage overflows and to minimize impacts from those overflows on District water resources.
Maintain or reduce existing flows from drainage within the watershed to decrease the negative effects of stormwater runoff and bounce from existing and proposed development as well as provide low flow augmentation to surface waters.
Development and the associated creation of new impervious surface increases the volume of stormwater runoff from the landscape, changes the rates and times to peak runoff flow, and decreases the amount of stormwater that naturally percolates into the soil to recharge groundwater. The District’s long term goal in the Christmas Lake subwatershed is to achieve no increase in the volume of stormwater discharged from the subwatershed into St. Albans Bay. Implementation strategies will include minimizing new runoff volumes from development, encouraging infiltration and groundwater recharge to maintain adequate hydrology to groundwater-fed wetlands and to Christmas Lake itself, and limiting new volumes in landlocked subwatersheds.
A key strategy to achieve this goal is the adoption of a volume management standard for new development and redevelopment that requires the abstraction (removal from runoff through infiltration, capture and reuse, evapotranspiration, etc.) of one inch of rainfall. Approximately 70 percent of annual runoff volume in Minnesota results from precipitation events of 1” or less (MPCA, 2000). Requiring new development and redevelopment to abstract (retain on site through infiltration, evapotranspiration, or capture and reuse) runoff from small events would significantly reduce new volumes of runoff flowing downstream and help reduce future erosion in streams and channels; minimize new pollutant loading that would have been conveyed by that stormwater; and help maintain groundwater levels, preserving wetlands.
Limiting discharges from subwatersheds and basins that are currently landlocked is necessary to prevent further degradation of downstream water quality as well as to limit new volumes discharged downstream to channels that are already experiencing erosion. Encouraging infiltration in landlocked basins is one means of controlling runoff volumes to help prevent localized flooding.
Table10. Modeled annual volume of runoff in the Christmas Lake subwatershed, and estimated reductions resulting from application of a proposed 1” abstraction rule for new development and redevelopment (acre-feet).
|
2020 modeled annual subwatershed runoff volume |
78.3 |
|
Ultimate Development modeled annual subwatershed runoff volume |
78.7 |
|
Increase between 2000 and Ultimate development |
0.4 |
|
Estimated volume abstracted by 1” rule |
0.3 |
|
New volume to be abstracted through other means such as capital projects, wetland restorations, reforestation and revegetation, etc. |
0.1 |
Some land-locked basins and pockets are identified in local water management plans for possible new outlets. These should be maintained as is to prevent additional discharge downstream to Christmas Lake.
Desired Outcomes: Management of new annual water volume discharged from the subwatershed.
Metrics: Acre-feet volume abstraction.
Reduce volume of stormwater runoff from new development and redevelopment and maintain existing water volumes discharged from the subwatershed into St. Albans Bay.
Manage water volumes to the upper watershed channel to prevent further erosion.
Limit new discharges from land locked basins and subbasins to prevent new impacts to Christmas Lake.
Require public stormwater conveyance and control structures in the watershed be sized and maintained properly to convey current and ultimate stormwater flows to minimize flooding and erosion potential.
Require LGUs to provide to the District a copy of their annual NPDES report.
Preserve the natural appearance of shoreline areas and minimize degradation of surface water quality which can result from dredging operations.
Eroding shorelines and streambanks contribute to the degradation of water quality. Native vegetation can effectively stabilize these areas, filter runoff for sediment and other pollutants, and provide habitat. Restoration of shoreline and streambanks on Christmas Lake, especially the steep slopes on the eastern shore; the channel draining the upper subwatershed; and wetlands within the subwatershed is a key strategy for meeting this plan’s goals.
Conservation or restoration of native vegetation along shoreline and streambank would provide habitat for both aquatic and terrestrial wildlife; help increase or maintain infiltration rates; decrease or maintain runoff rates and pollutant conveyance to water resources; and help minimize erosion. Sustaining or improving water quality and ecological integrity is necessary to meet District goals as well as to meet state and federal nondegradation, water quality and biological integrity requirements and to prevent the need for future TMDLs.
Desired Outcomes: Stable streambanks and shorelines to supplement other goals.
Metrics: Linear feet of stabilized eroded shoreline and streambank.
Promote shoreline restoration and shoreline buffer creation as methods to help meet pollutant loading reduction and ecological integrity goals.
Maintain the hydraulic capacity of and minimize obstruction to navigation without compromising wildlife habitat in watercourses and preserve water quality and navigation appearance in shoreland areas.
The District recognizes the riparian rights of property owners to have and maintain access to public waters. The District will not participate in the removal of nuisance aquatic vegetation solely for the purpose of improving navigation, but may consider macrophyte control where excessive growth contributes to poor water quality.
Desired Outcomes: Minimization of impacts on water resources from dredging.
Metrics: Compliance with the dredging policy.
Manage dredging activities so as to preserve the natural appearance of shoreline areas; recreational, wildlife and fisheries resources of surface waters; surface water quality and ecological integrity of the riparian environment.
Improve water quality by promoting best management practices (BMP's), requiring their adoption in local plans and their implementation on development sites.
This plan and District regulations stipulate the use of Best Management Practices (BMPs) to reduce stormwater volumes and pollutant loadings, but do not prescribe which practices should be used. This allows the LGU and developers the flexibility to implement those that are most appropriate for local conditions and opportunities. A key strategy for plan implementation is providing early consultation with and technical assistance to and education of stakeholders including city staff, residents, and developers to increase knowledge and acceptance of various BMPs and to promote their adoption.
Desired Outcomes: Implementation of Best Management Practices on private and public property to supplement other goals.
Metrics: Compliance with the early consultation requirement.
Promote best management practices as methods to help meet pollutant loading and volume management goals established in this subwatershed plan.
Enhance public participation and knowledge regarding District activities and provide informational and educational material to municipalities, community groups, businesses, schools, developers, contractors and individuals.
The District conducts an active strategic education and communication program watershed-wide to provide general information to various stakeholder groups in accordance with its five-year strategic education and outreach plan. Targeted information will be necessary in the Christmas Lake subwatershed to educate these stakeholders as to the District’s specific goals for this subwatershed, the actions the District plans to take, and their role in conserving water resources in the subwatershed. The specific targeted messages will emphasize shoreline stabilization on Christmas Lake and volume control in landlocked drainage areas.
Desired Outcomes: Stewardship over water resources by residents of the subwatershed to assist District activities and supplement other goals.
Metrics: Telephone survey.
Provide focused education and outreach opportunities within this subwatershed to supplement the general education and outreach program and assist in the achievement of these subwatershed goals.
Provide participation and outreach activities to increase awareness of water and other natural resources within the subwatershed.
Work cooperatively with other agencies and groups to coordinate education and outreach efforts to avoid duplication of efforts and maximize resources.
Maintain public ditch systems within the District as required under Statutory jurisdiction.
There are no Public Ditch goals and actions specific to the Christmas Lake subwatershed.
Preserve, create and restore wetland resources and maximize the benefits and functionality of wetlands to the watershed.
The Functional Assessment of Wetlands (FAW) evaluated and classified 58 acres of wetlands in the subwatershed, of which 33 acres were in the Preserve classification (see Table 8 in Section 2.5.4 and Figure 12). There are several wetlands of exceptional and high quality functions and values within this subwatershed. Their conservation is integral to achieving ecological integrity goals, as well as water quality, stormwater management, and floodplain management goals. There are also opportunities for wetland restoration.
A key strategy of this plan is regulation of wetland impacts in accordance with a management classification based on the functions and values findings of the Functional Assessment of Wetlands. Wetlands are assigned to a classification – either Preserve or Manage 1, 2, or 3 – and allowable impacts would be based on that classification. The wetlands with the highest values – those in the Preserve classification – would be allowed minimal impacts. The Manage classifications would be allowed some impacts, such as accepting new stormwater discharges, depending on classification. This strategy will preserve existing high values such as habitat, vegetative diversity, and sensitivity, while also recognizing that wetlands play an important part in managing stormwater. Wetlands provide essential storm and flood water storage.
Wetlands of exceptional or high vegetative diversity or fish or wildlife habitat value have been designated key conservation areas (see Figure 19), as have wetlands that are riparian to streams or channels, have high restoration potential, provide key floodplain storage, or are located in important natural resources conservation areas such as wildlife corridors. Except for those in the Preserve classification, which will be managed to an even higher standard, these conservation wetlands will be managed as if they were Manage 1 classification wetlands, with limitations on the amount of new runoff that can be directed to them, and a requirement to pretreat any new discharges to them.
An important part of achieving the goal of no net loss of wetland size, quality, and type will be tracking wetland impacts to assist in identifying future restoration or wetland creation needs.
Equally important to the regulation of wetlands is the restoration of degraded wetlands within the subwatershed. Figure 14 identifies wetlands based on restoration potential. Restoring wetlands increases specific functions and values of the resource within the watershed ranging from management of flows to water quality improvement to enhancement of the overall ecosystem, particularly within identified corridors.
Desired Outcomes: Maintain existing quantity and quality of wetlands throughout subwatershed; improve wetland and surface water quality within Key Conservation Areas.
Metrics:
Maintain existing acreage of wetlands in the subwatershed and achieve no net loss in their size, quality, type, and biological diversity.
Increase the quantity, quality, and biological diversity of Christmas Lake subwatershed watersheds through the restoration of impacted wetlands or creation of new wetlands.
Protect and maintain existing groundwater flow, promote groundwater recharge and improve groundwater quality and aquifer protection.
Maintenance of groundwater recharge is important in the Christmas Lake subwatershed to maintain hydrology to Christmas Lake and groundwater-fed discharge wetlands in the subwatershed as well as to recharge aquifers that supply public and private water wells. Development, with the associated creation of new impervious surface, increases the volume of stormwater runoff and reduces the amount of stormwater that naturally percolates into the soil to recharge groundwater.
Increased infiltration in the Christmas Lake subwatershed is desirable for three primary reasons: 1) to recharge groundwater inputs and reduce pollutant loading into Christmas Lake; 2) to help prevent localized flooding in landlocked basins with no natural outlet; and 3) to protect the hydrology of discharge (groundwater-fed) wetlands in the subwatershed. Some of those wetlands are key resources with high ecological values that are dependant on groundwater to maintain those functions and values. Much of the subwatershed has at least moderate infiltration potential. Requiring new development and redevelopment to infiltrate some of the new stormwater generated would reduce new volumes downstream and help reduce future erosion in streams and channels; minimize new pollutant loading that would have been conveyed by that stormwater; and help maintain groundwater levels, preserving wetlands.
Some parts of the subwatershed are areas of aquifer sensitivity or may be designated in the future as drinking water wellhead protection areas, where care should be taken when infiltrating stormwater. Proper design of infiltration practices is necessary to avoid groundwater contamination.
Groundwater management in the Christmas Lake subwatershed will focus on increasing the amount of infiltration in the subwatershed, and minimizing opportunity for groundwater contamination from land use practices.
Desired Outcomes: Maintain function of existing groundwater flow, assist in the protection of drinking water supply, no degradation in surficial groundwater quantity or quality.
Metrics:
Protect and maintain groundwater recharge and groundwater quality.
Reduce the severity and frequency of flooding and high water by preserving and increasing the existing water storage capacity below 100-year flood elevations on all waterbodies within MCWD.
Flood Insurance Studies have identified no floodplain in the Christmas Lake subwatershed. However, managing stormwater flows within this subwatershed is still important to help reduce the severity and frequency of localized flooding within the subwatershed. The primary strategy in the management of stormwater in the Christmas Lake subwatershed is the preservation of the existing stormwater storage provided by wetlands. Additional storage could be provided through the creation of depressional storage areas on new developments.
Desired Outcomes: No net loss of wetland storage.
Metrics: Acres net wetland fill.
Preserve the existing water storage capacity.
1. Promote the acceptability of minor flooding within the low lying areas.
Utilize District hydrologic and hydraulic data to identify potential public infrastructure high water impacts.
Promote the recreational use, where appropriate, of surface waters within MCWD by providing recreation opportunities for citizens by promoting the use and enjoyment of water resources with the intent of increasing the livability and quality of life within the watershed.
Christmas Lake is an exceptional recreational water resource in this subwatershed due to its water clarity and its fishery. The District’s primary strategies in promoting and supporting recreational use of Christmas Lake are protecting its water quality to support swimming and fishing, and managing aquatic vegetation.
Desired Outcomes: Manage surfaces waters to achieve water quality goals so designated use is maintained and unimpaired.
Metrics:
Support Christmas Lake recreational use by continuing to meet the State's aquatic recreation standard of 40 μg/L summer mean total phosphorus through the implementation of the programs and projects identified in this plan to reduce phosphorus loads and improve Christmas Lake water quality.
Support the Christmas Lake fishery through the implementation of the programs and projects identified in this plan to maintain ecological integrity and promote shoreline restoration.
Control temporary sources of sediment resulting from land disturbance and identify, minimize and correct the effects of sedimentation from erosion-prone and sediment source areas.
Erosion within the subwatershed can result in sediment being transported to lakes, wetlands, and streams, where it can degrade water quality and habitat. Steep slopes such as those on the east shore of Christmas Lake are prone to erosion and can negatively impact the lake’s exceptional water quality and clarity. The HHPLS identified the channel draining the upper subwatershed as another potential location prone to erosion. Identifying, addressing, and preventing erosion is necessary to meet District goals as well as to meet state and federal nondegradation, water quality and biological integrity requirements and to prevent the need for future TMDLs.
Requiring new development and redevelopment to infiltrate some of the new stormwater generated would reduce post-development volumes downstream and help reduce future erosion in streams and channels; minimize new pollutant loading that would have been conveyed by that stormwater; and help maintain groundwater levels, preserving wetlands. Limiting discharges from subwatersheds and basins that are currently landlocked is necessary to prevent further degradation of downstream water quality as well as to limit new volumes discharged to channels that are already experiencing erosion.
Strategies in the Christmas Lake subwatershed will focus on identifying erosion problems and working with LGUs and property owners to correct them. Identifying existing eroded shoreline locations and potential future locations for shoreline restoration is a priority, as is working cooperatively with the City of Chanhassen to evaluate restoration potential along the upper subwatershed channel.
Desired Outcomes: Reduction in pollutant loading of temporary and permanent nature from erosion to supplement other goals.
Metrics:
Identify and address erosion problems in the subwatershed.
Identify, inventory, and prioritize steep slope, shoreline and other erosion problems.
Work cooperatively with LGUs to address identified erosion problems.
Regulate new development and redevelopment and ensure compliance with erosion control standards.
Manage water volumes to the channel draining the upper subwatershed to prevent further erosion.
Implement the regulatory and management activities identified in this plan.
Inspect the upper subwatershed channel periodically to assess its condition.
Work cooperatively with the City of Chanhassen to reduce stormwater volumes to prevent erosion and sediment transport and stabilize streambanks as necessary.
Promote effective planning to minimize the impact of development and land use change on water resources as well as achieve watershed District Goals.
The District’s regulatory program is the means by which many of the goals enumerated here would be accomplished. As development and redevelopment occurs, property owners and developers are required to treat and control stormwater, limit impacts to wetlands, and meet other standards. Additional regulation may be necessary in the Christmas Lake subwatershed to implement the actions in this Plan.
Desired Outcomes: Utilize regulatory program to cost-effectively manage land use to achieve other goals.
Metrics:
In consultation with LGUs through an appropriate rulemaking process, amend existing or adopt new District rules to implement the actions identified here within two years of adoption of this Plan.
Solicit input from the general public with the intent that policies, projects and programs will address local community values and goals as well as protect historic and cultural values regarding water resources; strive to manage expectations; base decisions on an educated public; foster an educated and informed public within the watershed.
The District has good working relationships with the LGUs within the watershed, and maintains a Citizens Advisory Committee to obtain regular public input on issues of concern to the District and its citizens. As the District implements the actions identified in this Plan, including the education and communication actions described above, it will be important to obtain direct input from water resource users. The primary strategy for the Christmas Lake subwatershed will be working cooperatively with the Christmas Lake Association.
Desired Outcomes: Engage the public to encourage involvement in District activities and stewardship of area resources.
Metrics: Consultations with Christmas Lake Association and other interest groups.
Work cooperatively with the Christmas Lake Association.
The goals set forth in Section 4.0, Resource Management Goals and Strategies will require an integrated set of programs and projects oriented toward the conservation and improvement of water resources within the watershed. The following sections describe generally the activities that will be undertaken by various parties. Table 16 in Section 5.9 provides a cost estimate and schedule for the District’s responsibilities for new activities in the implementation program.
As discussed in Section 3.6 above, the subwatershed is mostly developed and future development is expected to contribute only a small amount of additional stormwater volume and pollutant load to Christmas Lake. To mitigate future impacts and to address other goals such as increased infiltration, wetland management, and improved ecological integrity, additional regulation may be necessary. A decision on rulemaking needs/standards can only be made after the formal rulemaking process. In addition, further amendments to the Rules should not be precluded by the content of the plan.
Additional regulatory controls on permitted development and redevelopment will be considered for this subwatershed to add volume management and infiltration requirements, implement wetland management in accordance with management classification, and increase scrutiny of development that may impact groundwater or key conservation resources. Regulations providing an incentive such as a volume reduction credit to developers to maintain undisturbed areas, reforest, or plant native vegetation will be considered.
The following are revised or additional regulatory controls in this subwatershed that would be necessary to assist the District in meeting the goals of this Plan:
Key conservation areas are identified on Figure 19. The District will provide technical assistance to the LGUs to identify and implement strategies for local conservation efforts in support of program goals.
The District operates a watershed-wide Strategic Education and Communications program that provides general watershed information as well as targeted information. The targeted education and public input activities identified in this plan will be implemented to assist in the maintenance of existing water quality in Christmas Lake and other water resources in the subwatershed as well as to minimize the impacts of future development. The specific targeted messages will emphasize stabilization of eroding shorelines on Christmas Lake, and stormwater volume management in landlocked basins.
To monitor progress toward meeting water quality and quantity goals, monitoring of Christmas Lake will continue to be routinely monitored through the District’s Hydrologic Data Program.
Lake aquatic plant monitoring provides information needed to manage aquatic plants, evaluate control measures, and plan for future actions. This monitoring is especially useful as water quality management activities are implemented and plant communities change in response to changing water quality. An aquatic vegetation management plan will be developed using existing aquatic vegetation data, however, one site visit will be required to assess shoreline vegetation and identify areas of shoreline erosion. The estimated cost of this activity is $6,000. The survey will be updated by staff/contractor every five years at an estimated cost of $8,000. Interim monitoring could be conducted by trained volunteers.
Wetlands with exceptional value vegetation are present in the subwatershed. Because of the importance to overall subwatershed ecological integrity of preserving these values, these wetlands will be regularly monitored for invasive species by staff or trained volunteers.
Activities detailed in this implementation plan will require new operations and maintenance activities in this subwatershed. These include:
Table 11. Ongoing District operations and maintenance tasks in the Christmas Lake subwatershed.
| Task | Spring | Summer | Fall |
| Inspect Erosion-Prone Reaches of Upper Subwatershed | As needed | Annually | As needed |
| Inspect High Vegetative Diversity Wetlands | Regularly | Regularly | Regularly |
Part of the phosphorus load reduction plan for Christmas Lake is a required reduction by the LGUs in the subwatershed of the phosphorus load contributed by existing land uses. The requirement is a 15 percent reduction in loading from existing residential land use and 10 percent from other developed land use. This reduction can be accomplished through: application of BMPs such as local water quality ponds, rain gardens and infiltration swales that reduce erosion or treat runoff; prevention of future load increases through the conservation of lands previously identified for development; or achieving load removals in excess of the minimum required. The LGUs identified below must identify in their local water management plans specific steps to accomplish these minimum reductions. The LGUs must also annually report to the District their progress toward accomplishing this requirement.
Table 12. Allocation of Christmas Lake subwatershed LGU phosphorus load reductions (lbs/yr).
|
Subwatershed Unit |
Shorewood |
Chanhassen |
Total |
|
All |
3 |
7 |
10 |
|
TOTAL |
3 |
7 |
10 |
A key element in achieving overall ecological integrity goals in the Christmas Lake subwatershed is the conservation of key ecological areas, including high-value wetlands and uplands. LGUs must identify in their local water management plans the areas shown on Figure 19. The local plan must also identify strategies the LGU will undertake to protect the ecological and hydrological values of those areas. These may include such strategies as land use regulation; acquisition and management; conservation easements; ecological restoration; and property owner education regarding land management strategies to maintain ecological integrity.
There are existing land-locked subwatershed units and basins within this subwatershed that the cities have been considering for outlet drainage projects. To protect the quality of downstream resources, local plans must either no longer consider this an option, or demonstrate how this could be achieved without impact to downstream water quantity or quality impacts. Outletting will generally be discouraged unless there is a demonstrated threat to property structures or public safety.
The HHPLS identified a number of locations where modeling predicts that public roads, private roads, or private drives might overtop during infrequent events, or where there may be minimal freeboard above the flood level (see Figure 2). Local plans should identify observed or these potential locations and assess whether the risk of occasional flooding is acceptable or should be addressed.
The HHPLS identified a number of locations where modeling predicts that under existing or future development conditions higher velocities than desired ay result in erosion at outlets or culverts, potentially warranting erosion control or energy dissipation. Local plans should identify observed or these potential locations, assess the need for such measures, and set forth a plan for preventing future erosion.
One of the water quality goals for this subwatershed is the achievement and maintenance of the Christmas Lake in-lake phosphorus concentration goal of 15 μg/L. The primary means of achieving and maintaining that goal will be limiting new phosphorus loads from development and other sources through the regulatory program, loading reduction allocations to LGUs, and operational programs. Table 13 below sets forth a summary plan for how this could be accomplished.
The table breaks down modeled phosphorus loading in the subwatershed by source: atmospheric deposition, external sources, and internal sources. Atmospheric deposition is a regional issue and is not dealt with here. The primary means of addressing external loading are through the regulation of new loads generated by development and the reduction of existing loads through the general application of BMPs. Application of the current regulatory program to new development would also reduce the expected load from ultimate development conditions.
Table 13. Phosphorus load reduction plan for Christmas Lake.
|
Source |
Reduction |
Ultimate Phosphorus Load[lb/yr] |
Planned Reductions [lb/yr] |
Final Loading | ||
|
Atmospheric | ||||||
|
Atmospheric Deposition |
NA |
62 |
NA |
62 | ||
|
External Loads | ||||||
|
External Load Determined from Modeling Land Use |
|
76 |
|
| ||
|
|
LGU allocation (Table 12) |
- |
10 |
| ||
|
|
Existing regulations |
|
1 |
| ||
|
Total After Reductions |
|
|
|
65 | ||
|
Internal / "Unknown" Loads | ||||||
|
Internal / "Unknown" Loads Determined from Modeling Land Use |
|
0 |
|
| ||
|
|
Internal Load |
|
- |
| ||
|
Total After Reductions |
|
|
|
0 | ||
|
Total Load | ||||||
|
TOTAL |
|
138 |
11 |
127 | ||
|
LOAD GOAL |
|
|
|
135 | ||
|
DIFFERENCE |
|
|
|
(-8) | ||
There are no District capital improvement projects proposed for the Christmas Lake subwatershed for this Plan cycle. The District may consider collaborative projects with the LGUs to restore wetlands or stabilize streambanks or shorelines.
This Plan identified the need to consider a diagnostic study of long-term water quality trends in Christmas Lake, but that study was not included in the 2007-2016 prioritized CIP. The Board may consider such a study during the time frame of this Plan if funds are available.
| Project | Christmas Lake Long Term Water Quality Trends Study | |
| Description |
Diagnostic study of long-term water quality trends in Christmas Lake | |
| Need |
While the water quality in Christmas Lake is among the best in the watershed (and Metro area), there has been a noticeable, long-term trend of declining water quality. The cause for this decline is not known, but may be a combination of groundwater changes, delayed impacts of urbanization, aquatic vegetation or other biotic sources, or some unknown source of sediment or nutrient loading. This proposed study would investigate and determine the likely causes of the slow decline in water quality and develop options for reversing that trend. | |
| Outcome | Identification of long-term strategies to protect water quality in Christmas Lake | |
| Estimated Cost and Funding | Diagnostic study. Funding source is the District capital levy. | $60,900 |
| Schedule |
One Year Prior to Implementation: Fish, vegetation, and zooplankton surveys, development of management plans No Year Assigned: Implementation of strategies | |
The following tables summarize the proposed implementation action items and their relationship to the problems and issues identified in section 3.0 above, the metrics by which the District will be evaluating progress toward resolving hose issues and problems, the estimated District cost of implementing those actions, and anticipated implementation schedule.
Table 14. Problems and issues identified in the Christmas lake subwatershed and actions proposed to address them.
|
|
Problem or Issue |
Actions in Implementation Plan |
Degree of Improvement |
|
Water Quality |
The water quality in Christmas Lake scores in the A grade range and nearly meets its TP concentration goal of 15 μg/L. |
|
Implementation of all the actions in the phosphorus load reduction plan would protect existing water quality.
|
|
There is a very slow trend of increasing phosphorus and declining water quality in Christmas Lake. |
|||
|
Development and redevelopment in the subwatershed will increase nutrient and TSS loads from the watershed as well as increasing the volume of stormwater runoff. |
Rules will be amended to add a volume management requirement on new development and redevelopment to reduce pollutant transport |
Would depend on ability of developers to incorporate adequate BMPs on their projects and properly maintain them to sustain removal efficiencies. | |
|
The HHPLS identified sediment accumulation and transport in the small channel that discharges into the south end of the lake. |
|
Depends on extent of problem and ability to develop cooperative or collaborative improvements. | |
|
Water Quantity |
Steep slopes in east shore of lake are erosion prone. |
|
Would depend on homeowner willingness to perform improvements. |
|
Landlocked subwatersheds and basins are present. |
|
Completed as LGUs complete their local plans. | |
|
Development, redevelopment, and reconstruction in the subwatershed, is predicted to increase volume of stormwater runoff from the watershed as well as increased nutrient and TSS loads. |
|
||
|
Stormwater velocity has caused erosion in the channel that conveys drainage from the southern subwatershed into the lake. |
|
Depends on extent of problem and ability to develop cooperative or collaborative improvements. | |
|
The subwatershed includes four wetlands with high to exceptional vegetative diversity, fish and wildlife habitat and aesthetic values that should be protected. |
|
||
|
Wetlands with high to moderate restoration potential should be considered for protection and restoration. |
|
Depends on extent of problem and ability to develop cooperative or collaborative improvements. This would begin to mitigate wetland losses from past development and help to increase the quantity and quality of wetlands present. | |
|
Ecological Integrity |
Few opportunities are available to conserve minimally disturbed landscapes, but there are potential restoration opportunities, including wetland restorations to improve and increase habitat; native vegetation restoration along the upper watershed channel; and urban forest restoration to increase evapotranspiration and reduce runoff.
|
Key Conservation Areas identified that include high-value wetlands. In key areas, LGUs are required to include in their local plans strategies for conserving these values. |
Ongoing effort that is dependant on property owner willingness to pursue conservation and LGU plan completion. |
|
Wetlands with high ecological values are present and should be conserves and connected to provide wildlife corridors |
Key Conservation Areas identified that include high-value wetlands. In key areas, LGUs are required to include in their local plans strategies for conserving these values. |
Ongoing effort that is dependant on property owner willingness to pursue conservation and LGU plan completion. | |
|
Christmas Lake is managed as a warm water-cool water lake and stocked with rainbow trout. It may be sensitive to thermal impacts, or changes in groundwater flow. Future development or redevelopment should take into acount potential thermal impacts to the lakes’s biota from direct runoff of stormwater, or from modifications to groundwater inputs.
|
Rules will be amended to add an abstraction requirement on new development and redevelopment to reduce new stormwater runoff and accompanying potential thermal impacts. |
Would depend on ability of developers to incorporate adequate BMPs on their projects and properly maintain them to sustain abstraction volumes. | |
|
Detailed information is available on aquatic vegetation in Christmas Lake, but no management plan is in place. Some Eurasian watermilfoil is present |
Plan includes development of an aquatic vegetation management plan. |
Completion of this plan would provide a plan for future activities by the District, LGUs, DNR, lake association, and other interested parties. | |
|
Groundwater |
Groundwater input is likely an important component of the Christmas Lake water budget and changes in water quality over the past decades may be due in part to changes in that imput. A more detailed model and analysis of Christmas Lake is necessary to better understand how both surface and groundwater inputs affect lake levels and water quality and to develop strategies for protecting this resource. |
Plan includes such a study.
|
Depends on outcome of diagnostic study |
|
The FAW concluded that the wetlands in the southern part of the subwatershed were discharge or combination discharge/recharge. Increased infiltration in the southern subwatershed may be helpful in preserving that hydrology. |
|
Infiltration on site will assist in preventing further modification of surficial groundwater recharge and help to maintain wetland hydrologic regimes. | |
|
|
There are a number of areas in the subwatershed that are very highly or highly sensitive to aquifer impacts. |
|
Will help minimize future impacts to groundwater and provide for proactive management rather than reactive |
|
Stormwater management should be coordinated with wellhead protection plans.
|
Stormwater and groundwater management within those areas will be coordinated with wellhead protection plans. |
Will help minimize future impacts to drinking water and provide for proactive management rather than reactive |
Table 15. Summary of metrics to be used in evaluating progress toward Christmas Lake subwatershed goals.
|
Objective |
Metric |
Existing |
Desired |
Location |
|
Water Quality |
Phosphorus Loading (lbs annually) |
138 (Ultimate) |
135 |
Christmas Lake |
|
Water Quantity |
Volume Reduction (Acre-feet) |
- |
0.3 |
Watershed-wide |
|
1.5 year discharge (cfs) |
708.8 |
708.8 |
Watershed-wide | |
|
100 year discharge (cfs) |
708.8 |
708.8 |
Watershed-wide | |
|
Wetlands |
Wetland Acreage |
304.8 |
304.8 or greater |
Watershed-wide |
|
33.2 |
33.2 or greater |
Preserve | ||
|
9.4 |
9.4 or greater |
Manage 1 | ||
|
5.4 |
5.4 or greater |
Manage 2 | ||
|
10.0 |
10.0 or greater |
Manage 3 |
Table 16. Summary of Christmas Lake subwatershed implementation Program
Printable PDF of Subwatershed Plan